Book of the dead book review
Ich bin bei den Pendergast-Büchern immer etwas zwiegespalten. Auf der einen Seite sind es sehr schillernde Charaktere und ziemlich exotische und spannend. A review, and links to other information about and reviews of The Dead the book is structured more by its images and digressions than by its. Whispers of the Dead has ratings and reviews. Amélie Whispers of the Dead is the third book in the David Hunter series and gives us a bit more. Das macht ihn zu einer äusserst interessanten Figur. Einige Lichtblicke, eher überdurchschnittlich, das gewisse Etwas fehlt Punkte: They'd been declared a National Park, although looking out of the car window I thought that nature was blithely unaware of such distinctions. So habe ich den 4. Although this can be read on its own out of sequence to the rest of the series, I do now feel like a little bit of background from the previous novels may have helped in building the voice of the protagonist. Access our reviews directly via 'metapsychology. Andere Nebencharaktere gleichen jedoch Abziehbildern von gängigen Stereotypen, die toughe Bundesagentin oder der arrogante Profiler zum Beispiel. Dennoch schafft es Beckett ihm noch ein bisschen mehr Tiefe, ein bisschen mehr Hintergrund zu verleihen. Am Ende des Buches fliegt er wieder zurück nach England. Jun 26, Charlotte Lisbon rated it really liked it. I'm hoping one day to put that knowledge to good use. Green River Thriller Black Honey: Want to Read saving…. This is a solid three-dimensional character. Die Spuren sind widersprüchlich. I am marking this 5 stars, but it is more like 4. Rex, Child turned to Preston and said: To make matters worse, Aloysius Pendergast casino austria linz in a top security prison and everyone that has always been jealous of him is gunning for the guy to go down, he bitcoin anleitung with that brilliantly, boy that was fun! Beste Spielothek in Osmarsleben finden really enjoyed Scott Brick's narration of the story and look forward to hearing him again. The Ramblings of a Minnesota Geek. Usually I read her books within a three day period, but this one took a few weeks. Maybe the worst book I csgo gambling sites 2019 read Bundesliga rekorde plot. My interest picked up when the t If you can get past the plot, which is utterly preposterous, this is a pretty good action read. Also in the mix is Beste Spielothek in Ostseebad Göhren finden pretentious and hateful TV pop-shrink who's an old menesis of Kay's, who's figuratively pulled the poor girl's britches down Beste Spielothek in Mansfeld-Unterstadt finden her TV show, which is basically a Jerry Springer-ish abomination pseudo-legitimzed by a psych degree. The 5 Best and Worst Remakes of the Decade. For the purposes of the novel, it euro basketball an amazing way to handle exposition of the plot without resorting to a hokey dialogue. One dreary December evening some years ago, I slogged in to my local Fred Meyer, stamping snow off my shoes, and encountered a die besten online games, friendly, dapper gentlemen hawking paperback books near the door. So we have pages and pages of painful scenes that have frauen aus italien sole purpose of manufacturing Golumn so that she can jump into a volcano. The Book of The Dead is the standard great stuff that one would expect from the insightful and intelligent duo, their stories breathe a life of their own and to me they feel different than other novels. There are hints of the tomb being cursed, but most tombs do have a curse on them as a stargames casino login of course, as a protection against grave robbers.
Great, but that's about all readers really know at this point -- and that Alex loves and misses his Egyptologist mom. If we're going to follow the twosome around the world for at least four more books, they should have been more fully developed as characters.
All the characters -- the cousin, the frog-faced doctor -- could use a bit more depth. Families can talk about ancient Egypt. W hat's so fascinating about it?
What more can you find out online? Will you play the online game if you haven't already? Or write some fan fiction? Do interactive books make you want to read more of them?
Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.
See how we rate. Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase.
Thank you for your support. Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate.
The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential. Learn how we rate. For Your Family Log in Sign me up. Is it ok for kids to read books outside their reading levels?
Column 4 Our impact report: How Tech is Changing Childhood. Book of the Dead: Book review by Carrie R. Wheadon , Common Sense Media.
Straightforward mummy adventure with a side of gamer fun. Michael Northrop Adventure Sign in or join to save for later. Parents say No reviews yet Add your rating.
Kids say No reviews yet Add your rating. Get it now Searching for streaming and purchasing options Common Sense is a nonprofit organization.
Your purchase helps us remain independent and ad-free. Get it now on Searching for streaming and purchasing options A lot or a little?
The parents' guide to what's in this book. What parents need to know Parents need to know that Book of the Dead is the first book in the multimedia TombQuest series.
Continue reading Show less. Stay up to date on new reviews. Get full reviews, ratings, and advice delivered weekly to your inbox.
User Reviews Parents say Kids say. There aren't any reviews yet. Book of the Dead is the 15th Scarpetta story, but Cornwell has begun to spread her attentions, breaking the pace of annual publication she kept up for the first decade and interspersing her Scarpetta novels with uneasy attempts at Florida satires in the Carl Hiassen style "The Andy Brazil Series" , a tendentious non-fiction book pinning the Jack the Ripper killings on the artist Walter Sickert, and even a couple of Scarpetta cookbooks, drawing on the passion for Italian food which the body-cutter uses in the novels as distraction from steaming intestines and exit wounds.
But, like Conan Doyle, Cornwell seems to have grudgingly accepted that public taste can not be bucked and the Scarpettas have again become annual events, although readers of Book of the Dead may suspect that this isn't really where the writer wants to be.
Yet, paradoxically, this definite undertow of grumpy reluctance deepens the book. Rather in the way that Ian Fleming's ennui with James Bond in the later books of the sequence emerged as an interesting ambiguity in about what he did for a living, so the possibility that Cornwell may have written too much about the same things informs the feeling that Scarpetta is a woman who has seen too much and dreams of getting out.
From the start of the book, the author employs a classic tactic, in both life and literature, for preventing boredom: Our heroine begins in Rome, assisting the arrogant and sexist Italian police on the murder of a young American tennis star, and then opens a new private practice - Coastal Forensic Pathology Associates - in South Carolina, where the hostility of the locals increases Scarpetta's always lively paranoia, and other murders occur which may be linked to the killing in Rome.
There are also new characters, although these unfortunately represent a tendency towards rather hokey Southern Gothic which has become apparent in later Cornwell: But, dutifully fulfilling the obligations of a series author, Cornwell keeps the usual repertory company in play, including the boorish ex-cop Pete Marino and Scarpetta's niece Lucy, a genius at the FBI, who holds a place in literary history as the first lesbian major character in mainstream crime fiction, or at least the first to be openly so.
No letters, please, about Miss Marple. Yet some kind of shadow now hangs over all the regular characters.
Gysin's beatnik friends, Ginsberg and Burroughs included, are depicted chanting in the street, their "heads shaven like Tibetan monks" and wearing orange robes: In fact, Evans-Wentz's book has been so influential it is surprising to learn that he translated only three chapters of the original work which, it turns out, is not even called The Tibetan Book of the Dead - that was his idea.
It's a magnificent achievement. The extra material includes an examination of the nature of mind "One's own mind is insubstantial, like an empty sky" and some beautiful verse meditations usually sung by monks performing their early morning duties.
There are aspirational prayers to be read at the moment of death, as well as a translation of the sacred mantras that can be attached to a corpse in order to bring "Liberation by Wearing".
An unexpected bonus is a light-hearted allegorical masque about travelling through the after-death state.
Chapter 10 reveals how to transfer our consciousness at the exact moment of death. This involves blocking up in our imagination the rectum the entrance to hell , the genitals entrance to the realm of the anguished spirits and other orifices, so that our consciousness escapes through the crown fontanelle, which we should visualise opening up.
If it leaks blood, it is a sure sign the deceased has attained buddhahood. It is said that if these ancient rituals are followed, even the unrefined and uncultured "however unseemly and inelegant their conduct" can attain enlightenment.
In fact, they have a head start on those devout monks and learned philosophers who pooh-pooh such practices. Combining Tibetan folklore with traditional medicine, another chapter tells us how to recognise the signs of our impending death.
Wicherly, as plans for the official opening proceed ominously. With Diogenes stalking Constance in Italy, and the New York mayor and his retinue locked in the tomb, this promises to be a really good show.
Indigenous tribes speak of ancestors who fled there to escape the Spanish invaders, and they warn that anyone who enters this sacred city will fall ill and die.
In , swashbuckling journalist Theodore Morde returned from the rainforest with hundreds of artifacts and an electrifying story of having found the Lost City of the Monkey God—but then committed suicide without revealing its location.
Three quarters of a century later, bestseller Doug Preston joined a team of scientists on a groundbreaking new quest. In he climbed aboard a rickety, single-engine plane carrying the machine that would change everything: In an unexplored valley ringed by steep mountains, that flight revealed the unmistakable image of a sprawling metropolis, tantalizing evidence of not just an undiscovered city but an enigmatic, lost civilization.
There was too much time spent on trying to break Pendergast in prison and police captain Laura Hayward being too proud to listen to Detective D'Agosta.
One thing is for sure: Two murders occurred before the opening of the Tomb of Senef I guess those monkeys never learn.
There was a character that turned me off and why was his last scene with the warden necessary? The man should have been deposited in a prison himself, not deported to another FBI office!
Everyone of the books has had the prerequisite Ass in Charge. A plotline that was a total turn off but ended out well: Diogenes seducing Constance Green.
I guess it was predictable but it was done too easily. What came later was awesome! The second part of the book was a lot more interesting and the only reason I gave the book 3 stars.
At that point, Pendergast has been broken out of one of those "no one can escape from here prisons" and reunited with his old crime fighting buddy Vincent D'Agosta.
Laura Hayward's come to her senses and realizes she needs to unite with D'Agosta and Pendergast to save all those unfortunates in the Tomb of Senef Best of all was the sudden change in Constance Greene.
Her pursuit and battle with Diogenes scenes were the best I've read in a long time. I felt cheated by "The Event".
I absolutely can see one brother goading another into trouble, I just can't see that particular outcome. Diogenes supposedly suffered brain damage in the ventromedial frontal cortex from the incident, which involved lights and sound.
For revenge, he wanted to induce it in millions of people. His first two victims had total psychotic breaks and became violent. They were beyond reason and so I wondered how Diogenes was able to think at all or be around people--years of self control?
I couldn't find any information on the so-called "Higginbottom region" but maybe it's out there somewhere. I know there's at least one more book now, one that focuses more on Constance Green.
I haven't decided whether I want to read it or not. I've been alternately exasperated, bored, and enthralled with the story so far I tend to enjoy books in a series more and more when I've developed a "relationship" with the characters.
This may not be the best written book in the series, but it feels like it to me because it is so true to the characters. Raise your hand if you really think a detective can be as near-omniscient as Sherlock Holmes.
Now, that being said, if you still enjoy suspending your disbelief enough to enjoy the improbable mastery of minutiae that Arthur Conan Doyle as Warning: Now, that being said, if you still enjoy suspending your disbelief enough to enjoy the improbable mastery of minutiae that Arthur Conan Doyle ascribed to Holmes, you would probably enjoy the Pendergast novels of Lincoln Child and Douglas Preston.
Some of the dust jackets of the hardbound versions of these novels compare Special F. Agent Pendergast and the Consulting Detective known as Holmes.
And how about all of those wonderful disguises used by both Aloysius and Diogenes Pendergast?! Frankly, if I had to believe the martial arts prowess demonstrated in one scene combined with the improbable escape in another, I would have exiled Child and Preston from the Wilsonian Library long ago.
Although they are clearly set in the latter part of the 20th century or first part of this century, they have atmospherics redolent of medieval Italy, antebellum U.
Child and Preston have an amazing ability to intertwine history and mystery within a modern conundrum. Not content with locked room mysteries, they insist on locked museum and locked prison mysteries, in spite of high-tech surveillance equipment and fail-safe procedures.
Ancient artifacts and legends are juxtaposed against surprisingly modern technologies and methodologies.
Most amazing to me in this novel was an introspective journey taken by Agent Pendergast at a critical point in the plot.
For the purposes of the novel, it was an amazing way to handle exposition of the plot without resorting to a hokey dialogue.
It was as suspenseful as many of the action scenes. There is a marvelous interplay between loyalty and betrayal played off between the various ongoing relationships we have seen developing in the course of the series, as well as the new one developing in this book.
It may well be because of my interesting in the Ancient Near East in general and in Egyptology in specific that I found this book more satisfying than usual, but I think this may have been the best yet.
Aug 09, JoJo rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: Recommended to JoJo by: Although all three books can be read without the other, if you read the last one first like i did, it ruins earlier books because you find out stuff ahead, like reading the last chapter of a book first.
Aug 10, C-shaw rated it it was amazing. Their writing is crisp and action-packed, with short chapters that can be read in a hurry.
One of the things I enjoy about a book is to come across words with which I am not familiar, in which case I usually look up the definition and write it in the book margin, thus hopefully improving my vocabulary.
This book is No. You never fail to steer me to good reads, Matthew. I neglected everything and read pages in two days. I feel like all my reviews for the Pendergast series are starting to sound the same, I'm gushing as if in love about how fantastic the books are but its still true, this story is phenomenal and it makes you want to read another and another, this could easily have thirty volumes and I would still want to read them all, as usual this book reads smooth as silk while the action cuts like a knife.
The Book of The Dead is the standard great stuff that one would expect from the insightful and intelligen I feel like all my reviews for the Pendergast series are starting to sound the same, I'm gushing as if in love about how fantastic the books are but its still true, this story is phenomenal and it makes you want to read another and another, this could easily have thirty volumes and I would still want to read them all, as usual this book reads smooth as silk while the action cuts like a knife.
The Book of The Dead is the standard great stuff that one would expect from the insightful and intelligent duo, their stories breathe a life of their own and to me they feel different than other novels.
Our world is filled with books, one can find them everywhere but whenever I read a Pendergast novel I feel as if I was holding something of heft and value, there is knowledge in these pages; ancient cultures, science, architecture, folklore and mysticism, curses, artifacts and it all sounds real enough to touch and some of it is but I especially adore all the breathtaking characters both good and bad and some in-between, in my opinion they are invaluable to the books.
I guess they speak to me, true love haha Pendergast lives in my mind beyond the pages of the book, that's how great he is.
The third in the Diogenes Pendergast trilogy and seventh in the Aloysius Pendergast series I highly recommend starting with Relic, Pendergast 1 story continues on the wild hunt to catch and expose the elusive Diogenes who is conveniently presumed to be dead by everyone but the small circle of our heroes.
The Queen of Narnia, The Heart of Eternity, The Indigo Ghost, Ultima Thule, The Fourth of July, The Zanzibar Green and of course Lucifer's Heart, all precious diamonds that were stole in the last installment are destroyed by Diogenes and arrive pulverized into a rainbow colored snow to the museum as a final act of madness and show of power.
The previous book was simply fantastic and it exposed Diogenes' identity but only to the reader, the entire museum still has no idea that not only is Diogenes alive but his secret identity is walking right under their noses.
To make matters worse, Aloysius Pendergast is in a top security prison and everyone that has always been jealous of him is gunning for the guy to go down, he deals with that brilliantly, boy that was fun!
Even though Aloysius is locked up he is the only one who can match up against his evil and twisted genius of a brother, their journey takes them half way through the globe and back.
My personal favorite part of the tale was the prison sequence, well pretty much all of it, I don't want to spoil anything but what happens to Pendergast in the prison is nuts.
I read all the parts while holding my breath, some I had to re-read because they were simply too good to only read once.
Ingenious and stunning, no deus-ex machina way out of this puppy! Lots of stuff happens, there is also the museum exhibit with a tomb that appears to be cursed, madness and mayhem breaks out as usual, lovers of museum thrillers will have a ball with the Tomb of Senef and those who love Pendergast will gobble up everything he does and says.
I was finally impressed with Constance, I never really gave her much thought before but through this book she became another strong contender for future stories and my dear Vincent D'Agosta, he was wonderful as was Laura Hayward.
For some reason Laura Linney the actress kept popping into my head when Hayward's scenes came up, she was something, the woman can hold her own.
This was such a tremendous journey with the two brothers that I'm not sad to see it over because I'm really looking forward to the next chapter, the next book sounds quite potent and meaty and I might need a bit of a break to let my brain prepare for another greatness of Preston and Child.
I don't read them back to back on purpose as much as I really want to, after all it's not good to eat dessert three times a day, same with books, I save the good stuff to be savored when I'm really in the mood for greatness.
Jun 03, Mike Moore rated it it was ok. Remember those old movies that blended cartoons and live action? This book reminded me of those, perhaps more the latter than the former.
The book starts with promise, presenting some compelling scenes and introducing some believable characters. Than we're introduced to the villain and the hero, two ridiculous cartoons striding through a world of normals.
The plot quickly spins out of the realm of the remotely plausible, as the cartoons seem to infect Remember those old movies that blended cartoons and live action?
The plot quickly spins out of the realm of the remotely plausible, as the cartoons seem to infect those around them, transforming the hapless humans into wacky, goofy caricatures that can then careen wildly through what's left of my credulity.
Any attempt to prevent spoilers ends here. I'm actually not that hard a case for this kind of thing. I'm generally happy to suspend disbelief and accept the world that the author wants to present, as long as its consistent and fulfills its objective in this case, pure entertainment.
So, even though I couldn't read the scenes with Diogenes Pendergast without seeing a wild eyed animated Christopher Lloyd in my mind, I was enjoying the book enough for a generally favorable three stars review.
There were two things that lost me though. First, I really want characters to have legitimate motivation. In this book, Diogenes is motivated to spend about a billion dollars, wantonly destroy half a million more in diamonds, dedicate about 15 years of his life to performing about man-years of work in a variety of disciplines that are not remotely related yeah okay, he's a cartoon, whatever , and kill dozens of people because You know, there was this thing that happened to him when he was a kid, and it just made him That's beyond what I can will away by suspension of disbelief.
Why is she there? Why should we care about her? And why does Diogenes risk his whole plan to sneak into her room and seduce her?
Okay fine, he's crazy like that he doesn't need a reason, but these are still the most ridiculous and seemingly pointless scenes of the whole book, and that's really saying something.
Well, it turns out that the reason for it all is so that Constance can come from out of nowhere in the end of the book and kill Diogenes by wrestling him into a live volcano.
She has to do it, because the main character can't bring himself to. She falls in as well. I'm pretty sure the volcano has some ominous name, like Mount Doom or the Gate of Hell or something.
So we have pages and pages of painful scenes that have the sole purpose of manufacturing Golumn so that she can jump into a volcano.
It's transparent in retrospect, because there was no other possible reason for those scenes to exist. That's beyond sloppy storytelling.
View all 4 comments. I picked this book up from my local library for a dollar. I believe it was a dollar well spent.
The creepy factor was right up there. I like how the authors used modern day techniques to achieve horrific situations. This was definitely a thrill ride and I enjoyed my time on it.
Feb 05, Paul rated it it was ok Shelves: I enjoyed Douglas Preston's recent best-selling sci-fi thriller, Impact also reviewed here on Facebook , but did not much like this one, a bit of airport trash he co-wrote with Lincoln Child.
It's not as bad as Ted Bell's Spy reviewed here: The Book of the Dead is one of a series of novels, with a cast of characters introduced and presumably more fully developed in earlier novels.
Unfortunately, though I enjoyed Douglas Preston's recent best-selling sci-fi thriller, Impact also reviewed here on Facebook , but did not much like this one, a bit of airport trash he co-wrote with Lincoln Child.
Unfortunately, though I think the authors intended it to be, it is anything but a stand-alone novel. Odd and peripheral characters are constantly being introduced with no explanation of what may have gone before -- two separate female characters had apparently been attacked and almost murdered in previous novels; another seems to a scientific and philosophical experiment, a year-old savant in the body of a woman in her 20s, with the social skills and worldly experience of a home-schooled year-old -- and you never quite grasp who these people are or why they are important.
The main characters, two brothers, are well explained, though improbable -- one is an evil genius, the other a good genius, each gifted with essentially superhuman powers.
And there's a female police captain, who is always referred to by her title, which is Captain of Homicide -- a most un-American kind of title, although she's NYPD.
In parts of the book it is all too clear that two writers are at work, often at cross purposes. In a climactic scene, the evil brother retreats to his volcanic island fortress, and suspecting that the year-old year-old woman has tracked him down and is even now climbing the volcano to reach his fortress, barricades himself deep within, surrounded by 3-foot-thick stone walls -- yet he not only hears her knock on the door, he says "who's there?
The plot, the cliffhangers, the main characters and some of the peripheral ones all have this in common: And yet this is not a comic book, or a fantasy like Harry Potter -- it's supposed to be a thriller, based in modern life and experience, and thus remotely possible.
Well, it ain't, and I didn't like it. This book is the last of the little trilogy within the Pendergast series that started with Brimstone and Dance of Death.
While I was really looking forward to reading it, I started out a bit slow, first because I was in the middle of a different book when my library order came in, and I started playing Dishonored on my and was trying to figure out what I was doing without dying too often.
But then I got a few chapters in and couldn't stop reading! All sorts of suspenseful things were going on This book is the last of the little trilogy within the Pendergast series that started with Brimstone and Dance of Death.
All sorts of suspenseful things were going on all at once, and this is one book where, if you read at least the previous book, you know exactly who the bad guy is, but none of the other characters do, and so you may find yourself yelling like me, "Noooo, don't listen to him!
Don't go in there with him! In any case, really good fun. Never a dull moment at that Museum! Feb 21, kartik narayanan rated it liked it.
The Book of the Dead is another so-so entry in the Pendergast-verse and brings the Diogenes trilogy to an end hopefully!
It suffers from the same malaise as the previous couple of books in that the antagonist is boring and the story boils down to Batman chasing the Joker in the Dark Knight.
There is no mystery and the protagonists are basically boring while having the ability to foresee random events.
And the ending is ambiguous enough without any form of closure. I hope the next book The Book of the Dead is another so-so entry in the Pendergast-verse and brings the Diogenes trilogy to an end hopefully!